raimund
minichbauer: you developed
uphone within the context of bureau of inverse technology
(bit). what are bit's aims and activities and in
which way does it work as a transnational group?
kate rich:
The Bureau is an information agency servicing the
Information Age; it works with information technologies
as its primary materials. BIT formed in Melbourne
in 1991 at a time when postnational corporations
and their artefacts (most visibly in the form of
new computer technologies) were becoming instrumental
in shaping the cultural landscape. So the Bureau
was formed as an anonymous collective - a means
to contest what we saw as the insidious consolidation
of anonymised corporate power through our own technologial
production.
Over the last decade we
have been exploring techniques for producing critical
information: via radio piracy, academic output,
video documentary, feral robotics, and through information
visualisation and product design (see http://bureauit.org
for more). We developed this work both within and
without larger institutions (art, academic, business).
The Bureau currently has offices in New York, San
Diego and Bristol.
raimund
minichbauer: uphone
allows people to call a local phone number and leave
a message, which will be automatically uploaded
to a streaming media server and be accessible via
a website in the internet. in radio20pwhitechapel
this technology was realised in the sparrow line.
what is the project about?
kate rich:
The Sparrow Report Line deals with the largely unsung
yet catastrophic decline in the sparrow population
of greater London (and coincidentally also in New
York, where we have another sparrow line awaiting
deployment). You could describe the project as a
form of expanded ornithology: ornithology as a news-medium.
So the sparrow: the Cockney
sparrow is an iconic East London bird, profoundly
integrated into the social history and identity
of London. In terms of information, it is also an
icon of global proliferation, inhabiting countless
metropolises worldwide. If you take the sparrow
as a kind of biological constant - a control - it
could render the climatic and environment conditions
around it. So the crash of the London sparrow population,
whilst poignant for Londoners, can also signal something
more alarming.
Much has been speculated
as to the cause of the London sparrow crash. Cats,
unleaded petrol, mobile phone masts ... In 2003,
the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds did
a headcount, using the distributed reporting of
thousands of backyard birdwatchers to assemble a
nationwide sparrow decline report. This is useful
data, but the Bureau's Sparrow Report Line takes
the accounting impulse further, increasing the 'resolution'
of the survey by enabling any citizen to phone in
to a local number & report their sparrow sightings,
theories, recordings or expressions of loss.
raimund
minichbauer: what
are the political aspects of the sparrow line?
kate rich:
Central to the Bureau's work is an interest in techniques
for collecting evidence. In the RSPB's distributed
birdcount, volunteers had a national day to file
their sparrow sightings - basically a numerical
response. In the case of the Sparrow Line, the opportunity
to present evidence is ongoing; you can present
hypercomplex data (verbal or auditory, anything
that can be recorded over a phoneline: the only
coordinates are the length of recording, you have
5 minutes). Your call is uploaded immediately to
the online audio database for public scrutiny, contestation,
annotation, remix or reuse. (http://bureauit.org/uphone/sparrow)
It positions the contributor less as generic volunteer
(accent, delivery, context are recorded along with
the 'content' of your comment); it also shares and
decentralises the costs of the operation - you actually
have to pay the price of a local call to participate.
The Sparrow Line - like
the Bureau's Antiterror Line which also uses Uphone
technology - is an experiment in increasing the
resolution of political representation - literally
giving voice to any number of embedded sparrow experts
- & actully the sparrows themselves which can
also be recorded over the phone line. It proposes
that definitive evidence might be assembled outside
of a laboratory-compiled 'expert' report.
raimund
minichbauer: what
is uphone in technical terms and how can people
get access to this tool?
kate rich:
The uphone is the technical system designed by the
Bureau. It enables any phone (home, cell, booth)
to act like a distributed microphone. Technically
it is a set of phone numbers and webservers. Phone
the London number and a modem connects you to the
local uphone server, currently located at Limehouse
Townhall. Voicemail software takes your call (we
are using Linux, VOCP.. more information at http://uphone.org)
and a set of scripts converts the audio to streaming
format (MP3). When you go to the website, all calls
show up automatically, timestamped and with a graphic
indicating call duration. You can use the webpage
to add a text annotation to any of the calls.
We have 2 Uphone servers,
London and New York, we are putting in a 3rd one
in riga latvia at the end of this year, a 4th server
is scheduled to install in west hollywood in 2005).
You can see the scripts and rough instructions on
how to set one up on the website - alternately you
could contact us to request a mailbox for your own
application on an existing uphone server.
raimund
minichbauer: how did
your background in radio influence uphone?
kate rich:
I was interested in the concept of radio talkback.
In broadcast radio, talkback is when the public
can phone in and go live to air: voice their opinion
on something. There is the impression of the democratic
voice, but it is getting heavily filtered via the
host, who picks which callers go to air and how;
when their call is curtailed, what is discussed
etc. And - having worked in radio for several years
in Melbourne - it's not actually live, there's a
legally enforced 15 second delay so the caller can't
say anything adverse.
The uphone is more like
an audio-BBS: an open format, the filtering mechanisms
are when your coin runs out or when the system hangs
up on you - 5 minutes, and you know this in advance
- it's an open system, the mechanics of it are explained
and available. So it's like talkback without the
host.
raimund
minichbauer: in which
way did the political development influence bit's
concept of 'inverse technology?' i would like to
use two examples: the small airplane with a video
camera flying over silicon valley in 1997 (http://www.bureauit.org/plane/),
and five years later in new york a rocket with a
video camera counting the participants of an 'anti
globalization' demonstration. (http://www.bureauit.org/rocket/).
kate rich:
These 2 projects could point out a difference in
BIT treatment of scale and agency. The Bit Plane
is more historical and heroic in approach: we flew
this tiny video-instrumented remote-control aircraft
over Silicon Valley to collect a definitive aero-portrait
of the Information economy (in its pre-crash configuration).
It was a singular flight, visualising and historicising
a particularly resonant location.
With the Bit Rocket, the
technology is similar (a transmitting micro-video
camera attached to an airbourne device) but the
scale is much more immediate, it is about distributed,
repeated use, reporting accurate news and communicating
about and between street protestors. It produces
images with immediate utility: the political evidence
of the crowd count - as well as a guidance system
for protests in-progress. Demonstraters can get
equivalent aerial perspective to the live helicopter
visions available to their police oponents.
Technologically there
is also a shift, triggered by actually a real decline
in the viability of amateur equipment like these
videotransmitters. In 1996 there was not a lot of
cellular phone infrastructure around. By 2004, the
massive proliferation of mobile phones and low-power
transceivers operating on the same licence-free
FM frequencies as the videotransmitters (433 Mhz
and 2.4 Ghz) - is causing high levels of interference
and effectively terminating the flight range of
the BIT devices at a few hundred feet (the BIT Plane
in 1996 could send clear control-view video from
distances of up to 1km). So in 2004 the rocket,
with it's brief ascent and parachute landing, is
more realistic.
raimund
minichbauer: one difference
between uphone and previous bit-projects is the
way of collecting data: it is not like a camera
reacting to certain signals (noise, motion) and
then automatically starting to record, but it is
the praticipation of people who call the uphone.
which differences does this trigger?
kate rich:
It's a different kind of attention: with the uphone
the trigger is still environmental, but you can
see it as a more durational process. The sparrows,
in disappearing, act as environmental 'canaries';
the caller interprets this, acting as kind of spokesperson
for the vanishing birds. The slow accretion of calls
maps out this kind of 'sparrow-shaped hole' over
London.
Same with the antiterror
line - http://bureauit.org/antiterror
- here people experiencing or witnessing antiterror
attacks (as a result of increased policing, post-September
11th) set off a slow, distributed environmental
alert to this climate change in civil liberties.
The Bureau is looking
at richer ways of collecting data than the simple
triggeres of technological systems, allowing that
collective interpretation is an essential component
of this kind of evidence.